The Lord of the Rings has had an incredible influence in the world of literature and film. The film franchise paved the way for fantasy films, proving that epic fantasy can be visually and emotionally engaging, building a franchise that has a lasting legacy on the industry. None of this would have been possible without J.R.R. Tolkien. This post highlights the many reasons you should read the Lord of the Rings.
Characterisation
The most distinctive difference between the book and the film is in the characters. The changes in the film, especially with Aragorn’s reluctant leader persona, benefitted the dramatic tension in the film. However, the book sees him assert his role quite early on in the series with a clear understanding of his destiny. The dynamic between the fellowship was particularly compelling as the bonds that bound them were tested and loyalty wavered under the influence and threat of the one ring.
There is a subtle nuance in Tolkien’s characterizations, with our understanding of the character’s nature deriving largely from the smaller details found in their words and actions. It’s in these moments that we come to see how varied the fellowship is in terms of culture and race. This attention to detail highlights how our characters provide further insight into Middle-Earth’s history and culture.
While Tolkien’s characters are often crucial to understanding the dynamic between Middle-Earth’s inhabitants, there are a select few that are quite puzzling. This is especially true in the presence of Tom Bombadil. While his introduction in the Fellowship of the Ring was entertaining, his appearance left us with a lot of unanswered questions. He’s an enigma, whose presence felt out of place in the narrative.
Prose
The hardest part of reading Lord of the Rings is having to adapt to Tolkien’s style of writing. His style of writing is graceful, poetic, and highly immersive, but also quite old fashion, which is understandable considering the time it was written. However, that doesn’t make the books any less engaging, and one of the most surprising elements of the narrative was the musicality of it. The films offer a glimpse of the poetic nature of the books, but it barely scratched the surfaced. Characters, like Legolas, often break into song or poetry, and while some may find call them a hindrance to the story, I find that they contributed to the richness of the culture of Middle-Earth.
The biggest criticism would be the lack of dramatic tension. This might be due to the ease in which arising conflicts are dealt with and the lack of a physical villainous presence, but the threat and urgency of the quest weren’t as effective as it should have been.
Richly Imaginative
It is easy to see where Peter Jackson found his inspiration because Tolkien’s world-building is incredibly intricate and vivid, easily capturing the reader’s imagination. The musicality of his prose heightens this richness of Middle-Earth. However, it’s not just the vivid imagery that makes this world feel so real, but also the detailed attention Tolkien dedicates to the language of this world. The appendices, found in Return of the King, highlights Tolkien’s passion for languages with an insightful exploration of the dialect of Middle-Earth. The sheer scope of the world Tolkien has created is incredible and the attention to detail in establishing the history of Middle-Earth is unrivalled.
A product of its time
Looking at this series from the perspective of the 21st century, there is a clear disparity in the representation of females in the book, something which the films rightly expands upon. The lack of female representation was expected and the difference between the role of women in the book and film is insane. Arwen felt like a phantom presence, for the most part, and the dynamic between Eowyn and Theoden/Aragorn was only felt in the unspoken words between them. However, while their roles were greatly reduced, they still made their presence felt when they did appear on the page.
A Timeless Classic
There is no denying the fact that the Lord of the Rings trilogy is a timeless classic and paved the way for fantasy in literature and film. The sheer scope of the world J.R.R Tolkien created is phenomenal. With characters of all over middle-earth uniting to fulfil this quest, we are treated to an adventure that explores the strength of hope and how the courage of unconventional heroes shaped the future of Middle-Earth.
Have you read the Lord of the Rings?
What was your favourite book?
Do you prefer the films to the book?
Ahh I’m so happy to see this post pop up in my reader! Not many people I know have read lotr and I honestly love it so so much it’s one of my favourite works ever. At first it was really difficult to adjust to tolkein’ s prose but once I did, it was all so beautiful and magical! Great post!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve been such a fan of the films for so long that I had to read the books. It deserves so much love just for the richness of the story. Once I got used to his prose everything clicked.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sometimes I wonder if the lack of females is representative of the time the book was written or of the time Tolkien was inspired book. There IS actual Middle English literature about women, of course, but I wouldn’t really expect a female knight in a story from the 1300’s, and part of me thinks that adding a woman to the Fellowship would have made the story “less realistic” in some sense. I do think Tolkien actually had great respect for women, and the powerful women that are present in his stories–Galadriel, Eowyn, some of the Valar, Luthien, etc.–reflect that.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I love this comment and you are so right in your view of female representatives. I’ve not read any of Tolkien’s other works, but I have seen comments that praise his characterisation of female characters, and even with their limited role in lord of the rings, they made their presence felt.
LikeLike
I don’t know if I agree with many of your points, but I do know that I agree people should read it, but I do think it should never be first read as an audiobook where it is almost impossible to skip the poetry.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I feel like I’d have a tougher time getting into the audiobook, but I definitely think fantasy fans should read this book. It is a timeless classic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What an interesting post! I have only seen the movies. I’m not sure I would ever read this series, but your reasoning makes sense to me. ๐
LikeLiked by 1 person
The books can definitely be daunting and the prose is not the easiest to get into, but the books really highlight the richness of Tolkien’s world building.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Awesome post! I do get what people mean about it being a product of its time (though I do tend to agree with Briana on the point about women) but I like how you balanced this review with reasons for and against the book- it made it really balanced and let’s people know exactly what they’re in for- and ultimately why they should read it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I loved Briana’s point about female representation and it makes so much sense. I think any ‘classic’ is not without its flaws, but the richness of the world-building and his characterisations were just so excuisite that it oughtweighed the negatives.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah me too! Absolutely! ๐
LikeLike
Amazing post! ๐ I really enjoyed reading your thoughts on The Lord of the Rings. I have read the books, but it’s been many years so my memory of them isn’t the best. I actually read them all in German, though now I own English copies of it as well. ๐ I should read them in English as well at some point.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Apologies for the very late reply, but I think it’s so interesting to see how the various editions compare to one another. I hope you enjoy the English copies as well. ๐
LikeLiked by 1 person